Volume 23, Issue 2 (Jun _ Jul 2019)                   J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2019, 23(2): 164-181 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soltanian S. The Effect of Plant-Derived Compounds in Targeting Cancer Stem Cells. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2019; 23 (2) :164-181
URL: http://journal.qums.ac.ir/article-1-2831-en.html
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. , sarasoltanian@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 8228 kb]   (219 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (708 Views)
Full-Text:   (190 Views)
1. Introduction
ancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumor-initiating cells are a subpopulation of cancer cells. CSCs can self-renew (maintaining a population of CSCs) and differentiate into less tumorigenic non-CSCs [3]. Moreover, CSCs have a high resistance to chemo-radiotherapy through a variety of mechanisms. There is evidence of increased drug inactivation through the higher expression of detoxifying aldehyde dehydrogenases enzymes. These are a super-family of enzymes involved in oxidizing aldehydes to carboxylic acids, and increased activity of some isoforms is associated with detoxification capabilities of CSCs [30]. The platinum group of chemotherapeutic agents induces DNA damage. Cancer cells often have defective DNA repair pathways, and due to their rapid proliferation, these cells are often in S-phase, which is a vulnerable phase for DNA damage.
Therefore, DNA damage leads to cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Data from many studies imply that CSCs have elevated levels of DNA repair. This is one explanation for the resistance of some tumors to platinum agents [34, 35]. CSCs increase expression of ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transport proteins of ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2. These ABC transporters can efflux a wide array of chemotherapeutic drugs, and their expression is a major cause of multi-drug resistance in cancers [28, 29]. There is evidence to suggest that CSCs may be more quiescent or slower-cycling than their non-CSCs counterparts.
Quiescence and a slower progression through the cell cycle in CSCs would render these cells less susceptible to cell-cycle targeted therapies such as the antimitotic class of chemotherapeutics [34]. Three important signaling pathways contribute to both CSC maintenance and chemo-resistance; Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and Hedgehog (Hh) pathways. 
In sum, CSCs have a role in all phases of tumorigenesis: initiation, progression, invasion, metastasis spreading, and tumor recurrence following chemotherapy [40, 41, 57, 51, 53]. Therefore, cancer therapeutic agents that selectively target CSCs, the root of cancer origin and recurrence, have been thought of as a promising approach to improve cancer survival rate or even to cure cancer. Today, numerous studies have shown that many plant-derived phytochemicals have antioxidant and anticancer effects. In addition, accumulating evidence has shown the anti-CSCs ability of many phytochemicals in many cancers [7].
This study aims to provide an overview of recently acquired scientific knowledge regarding some important phytochemicals, which have shown the capability to target and kill CSCs [63, 73, 82, 96, 100]
2. Materials and Methods 
Electronic databases of Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched for valid published papers in prestigious international journals using the following keywords: “Cancer stem cell”, “phytochemical”, “cancer therapy”, “chemotherapy and radiotherapy” and “chemo-resistance”. Finally, 100 papers were selected for conducting the review. These 100 articles were related to the characterization of CSCs, mechanism of chemo-resistance, natural products, and phytochemicals that target CSCs.
3. Results
At first, properties of CSCs, mechanism of CSCs to overcome traditional cancer therapy, and important signaling pathways modulating their stem-like properties were explained. The core of the review was dedicated to introducing some important phytochemicals and their mechanism for targeting and inhibiting various types of CSCs. Plant-derived phytochemicals are defined as bioactive non-nutrient plant chemicals. It is predicted that more than 5000 particular phytochemicals have been recognized in grains, fruits, and vegetables, but a large percentage are still unknown and must be identified. Different biologically active phytochemicals have been identified as capable of controlling the carcinogenesis at different stages. Phytochemicals can impede initiation or repeal the promotion step of multistep carcinogenesis.
They can also stop or postpone the development of pre-cancerous cells into the malignant ones. Different mechanisms are involved in chemoprevention of different phytochemicals. For example, the antioxidant activity of phytochemicals leads to scavenge free radicals and reduce oxidative stress. Moreover, phytochemicals can inhibit cell proliferation, oncogene expression, cell adhesion, and invasion and induce tumor to suppress gene expression and cell cycle arrest. Unlike current chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy that largely target cells proliferation and differentiation, which form the bulk of the tumor (but not CSCs), in many reports, it was demonstrated that several phytochemicals have anti-CSCs effects. 
4. Conclusion
In this study, we provided a comprehensive review of some important dietary phytochemicals targeting CSCs. Moreover, the mechanism of natural products for targeting CSCs was discussed. Phytochemicals can sensitize CSCs to conventional treatment, induce cell death, and inhibit self-renewal in CSCs, induce CSCs to differentiate, prevent CSCs from entering a dormant and more resistant state. In addition, they target Wnt/ Notch/ Hedgehog signaling pathways, inhibit aldehyde dehydrogenase and ABC transporter, target cellular surface markers, and suppress EMT and migration ability of CSCs. In conclusion, dietary phytochemicals are suggested to possess anti-cancer properties with minimal or no side effects. Moreover, they have a significant impact on CSCs. Therefore, they may also improve the efficiency of chemo-radiotherapy and reduce recurrence or relapse of malignancy.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This article is a meta-analysis with no human or animal sample.
Funding
Research on anti-cancer effects of phytochemicals was supported by a grant from Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks authorities of the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.

 
References
  1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000; 100(1):57-70. [DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9]
  2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011; 144(5):646-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013] [PMID]
  3. Frank NY, Schatton T, Frank MH. The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J Clin Investig. 2010; 120(1):41-50. [DOI:10.1172/JCI41004] [PMID] [PMCID]
  4. Longley D, Johnston P. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J Pathol. 2005; 205(2):275-92. [DOI:10.1002/path.1706] [PMID]
  5. Soltanian S, Sheikhbahaei M, Mohamadi N. Cytotoxicity evaluation of methanol extracts of some medicinal plants on P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2017; 7(7):142-9. [In Persian]
  6. Soltanian S. Phytochemical composition, and cytotoxic, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of Semenovia suffruticosa. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2018; 9(2):143-52. [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Liskova A, Kubatka P, Samec M, Zubor P, Mlyncek M, Bielik T, et al. Dietary phytochemicals targeting cancer stem cells. Molecules. 2019; 24(5):1-20. [DOI:10.3390/molecules24050899] [PMID] [PMCID]
  8. Kapinova A, Kubatka P, Golubnitschaja O, Kello M, Zubor P, Solar P, et al. Dietary phytochemicals in breast cancer research: Anticancer effects and potential utility for effective chemoprevention. Environ Health Prev Med. 2018; 23(1):1-18. [DOI:10.1186/s12199-018-0724-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
  9. Clarke MF, Dick JE, Dirks PB, Eaves CJ, Jamieson CH, Jones DL, et al. Cancer stem cells-perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(19):9339-44. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3126] [PMID]
  10. Caceres-Cortes J, Mindeni M, Patersoni B, Caligiuri MA. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature. 1994; 367(6464):645-8. [DOI:10.1038/367645a0] [PMID]
  11. Baba T, Convery P, Matsumura N, Whitaker R, Kondoh E, Perry T, et al. Epigenetic regulation of CD133 and tumorigenicity of CD133+ ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009; 28(2):209-18. [DOI:10.1038/onc.2008.374] [PMID]
  12. Eramo A, Lotti F, Sette G, Pilozzi E, Biffoni M, Di Virgilio A, et al. Identification and expansion of the tumorigenic lung cancer stem cell population. Cell Death Differ. 2008; 15(3):504-14. [DOI:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402283] [PMID]
  13. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(18):5821-8. [PMID]
  14. Zhang Q, Shi S, Yen Y, Brown J, Ta JQ, Le AD. A subpopulation of CD133+ cancer stem-like cells characterized in human oral squamous cell carcinoma confer resistance to chemotherapy. Cancer Let. 2010; 289(2):151-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2015.01.044] [PMID]
  15. Zhao JS, Li WJ, Ge D, Zhang PJ, Li JJ, Lu CL, et al. Tumor initiating cells in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas express high levels of CD44. PlOS One. 2011; 6(6):e21419. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0021419] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. Soltanian S, Riahirad H, Pabarja A, Jafari E, Khandani BK. Effect of Cinnamic acid and FOLFOX in diminishing side population and downregulating cancer stem cell markers in colon cancer cell line HT-29. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2018; 26(1):19-29. [DOI:10.1007/s40199-018-0210-8] [PMID]
  17. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003; 100(7):3983-8 [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0530291100] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Cheung PF, Cheung TT, Yip CW, Ng LW, Fung SW, Lo CM, et al. Hepatic cancer stem cell marker granulin-epithelin precursor and β-catenin expression associate with recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targ. 2016; 7(16):21644-57. [DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.7803] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Du Y, Ma C, Wang Z, Liu Z, Liu H, Wang T. Nanog, a novel prognostic marker for lung cancer. Surg Oncol. 2013; 22(4):224-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2013.08.001] [PMID]
  20. Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ. Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(23):10946-51. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2018] [PMID]
  21. Yeung TM, Gandhi SC, Wilding JL, Muschel R, Bodmer WF. Cancer stem cells from colorectal cancer-derived cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107(8):3722-7. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.0915135107] [PMID] [PMCID]
  22. Richichi C, Brescia P, Alberizzi V, Fornasari L, Pelicci G. Marker-independent method for isolating slow-dividing cancer stem cells in human glioblastoma. Neoplasia. 2013; 15(7):840-47. [DOI:10.1593/neo.13662] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. Li C, Heidt DG, Dalerba P, Burant CF, Zhang L, Adsay V, et al. Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(3):1030-7. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2030] [PMID]
  24. Zhou C, Sun B. The prognostic role of the cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50(12):1144-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.08.018] [PMID]
  25. Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol. 1996; 175(1):1-13. [DOI:10.1006/dbio.1996.0090] [PMID]
  26. Silva IA, Bai S, McLean K, Yang K, Griffith K, Thomas D, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase in combination with CD133 defines angiogenic ovarian cancer stem cells that portend poor patient survival. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(11):3991-4001. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3175] [PMID] [PMCID]
  27. Chen S, Hou JH, Feng XY, Zhang XS, Zhou ZW, Yun JP, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of putative stem cell marker, CD44 and CD133, in human gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 107(8):799-806. [DOI:10.1002/jso.23337] [PMID]
  28. Scharenberg CW, Harkey MA, Torok-Storb B. The ABCG2 transporter is an efficient Hoechst 33342 efflux pump and is preferentially expressed by immature human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2002; 99(2):507-12. [DOI:10.1182/blood.V99.2.507] [PMID]
  29. Litman T, Brangi M, Hudson E, Fetsch P, Abati A, Ross DD, et al. The multidrug-resistant phenotype associated with overexpression of the new ABC half-transporter, MXR (ABCG2). J Cell Sci. 2000; 113(11):2011-21. [PMID]
  30. Ucar D, Cogle CR, Zucali JR, Ostmark B, Scott EW, Zori R, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity as a functional marker for lung cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2009; 178(1):48-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.029] [PMID] [PMCID]
  31. Cheung A, Wan T, Leung J, Chan L, Huang H, Kwong Y, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in leukemic blasts defines a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with adverse prognosis and superior NOD/ SCID engrafting potential. Leuk. 2007; 21(7):1423-30. [DOI:10.1038/sj.leu.2404721] [PMID]
  32. Duong HQ, Hwang JS, Kim HJ, Kang HJ, Seong YS, Bae I. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 confers intrinsic and acquired resistance to gemcitabine in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma MIA PaCa-2 cells. Int J Oncol. 2012; 41(3):855-61. [DOI:10.3892/ijo.2012.1516] [PMID] [PMCID]
  33. Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006; 444(7120):756-60. [DOI:10.1038/nature05236] [PMID]
  34. Eyler CE, Foo WC, LaFiura KM, McLendon RE, Hjelmeland AB, Rich JN. Brain cancer stem cells display preferential sensitivity to Akt inhibition. Stem Cells. 2008; 26(12):3027-36. [DOI:10.1634/stemcells.2007-1073] [PMID] [PMCID]
  35. Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, Tunici P, Ng H, Abdulkadir IR, et al. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer. 2006; 5(67):1-12.[DOI:10.1186/1476-4598-5-67]
  36. Konopleva M, Zhao S, Hu W, Jiang S, Snell V, Weidner D, et al. The anti‐apoptotic genes Bcl‐XL and Bcl‐2 are over‐expressed and contribute to chemoresistance of non‐proliferating leukaemic CD34+ cells. Br J Haematol. 2002; 118(2):521-34. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03637.x] [PMID]
  37. Madjd Z, Mehrjerdi AZ, Sharifi AM, Molanaei S, Shahzadi SZ, Asadi-Lari M. CD44+ cancer cells express higher levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in breast tumours. Cancer Immun Arch. 2009; 9:4. [PMID] [PMCID]
  38. Soltanian S, Dehghani H. BORIS: A key regulator of cancer stemness. Cancer Cell Int. 2018; 18(154):1-13. [DOI:10.1186/s12935-018-0650-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
  39. Forouzesh F, Agharezaee N. Review on the molecular signaling pathways involved in controlling cancer stem cells and treatment. J Qazvin Uni Med Sci. 2018; 22(3):77-92. [DOI:10.29252/qums.22.3.77]
  40. Weng AP, Lau A. Notch signaling in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pathol. 2011; 223(2):262-73.
  41. Sandy AR, Maillard I. Notch signaling in the hematopoietic system. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009; 9(11):1383-98 [DOI:10.1517/14712590903260777] [PMID]
  42. Guo S, Liu M, Gonzalez-Perez RR. Role of Notch and its oncogenic signaling crosstalk in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1815(2):197-213. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.12.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
  43. Es-haghi M, Soltanian S, Dehghani H. Perspective: Cooperation of Nanog, NF-κΒ, and CXCR4 in a regulatory network for directed migration of cancer stem cells. Tumor Biol. 2016; 37(2):1559-65. [DOI:10.1007/s13277-015-4690-6] [PMID]
  44. Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008; 133(4):704-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027] [PMID] [PMCID]
  45. Hermann PC, Huber SL, Herrler T, Aicher A, Ellwart JW, Guba M, et al. Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2007; 1(3):313-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.stem.2007.06.002] [PMID]
  46. Harrison H, Farnie G, Howell SJ, Rock RE, Stylianou S, Brennan KR, et al. Regulation of breast cancer stem cell activity by signaling through the Notch4 receptor. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(2):709-18. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1681] [PMID] [PMCID]
  47. Taipale J, Beachy PA. The Hedgehog and Wnt signalling pathways in cancer. Nat. 2001; 411(6835):349-54. [DOI:10.1038/35077219] [PMID]
  48. Clevers H. Wnt breakers in colon cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004; 5(1):5-6. [DOI:10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00339-8]
  49. Reya T, Duncan AW, Ailles L, Domen J, Scherer DC, Willert K, et al. A role for Wnt signalling in self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. 2003; 423(6938):409-14. [DOI:10.1038/nature01593] [PMID]
  50. Yang W, Yan HX, Chen L, Liu Q, He YQ, Yu LX, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to activation of normal and tumorigenic liver progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(11):4287-95. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6691] [PMID]
  51. Yang L, Xie G, Fan Q, Xie J. Activation of the hedgehog-signaling pathway in human cancer and the clinical implications. Oncogene. 2010; 29(4):469-81. [DOI:10.1038/onc.2009.392] [PMID]
  52. Song Z, Yue W, Wei B, Wang N, Li T, Guan L, et al. Sonic hedgehog pathway is essential for maintenance of cancer stem-like cells in human gastric cancer. PlOS One. 2011; 6(3):e17687. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0017687] [PMID] [PMCID]
  53. Yao J, An Y, Wie JS, Chen P, Miao Y, Ji ZL, et al. Cyclopamine reverts acquired chemoresistance and down-regulates cancer stem cell markers in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141(2122):1-7. [DOI:10.4414/smw.2011.13208]
  54. Hong SP, Wen J, Bang S, Park S, Song SY. CD44‐ positive cells are responsible for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009; 125(10):2323-31. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.24573] [PMID]
  55. Yu Y, Kanwar SS, Patel BB, Nautiyal J, Sarkar FH, Majumdar AP. Elimination of colon cancer stem-like cells by the combination of curcumin and FOLFOX. Transl Oncol. 2009; 2(4):321-8. [DOI:10.1593/tlo.09193] [PMID] [PMCID]
  56. Barreto JN, McCullough KB, Ice LL, Smith JA. Antineoplastic agents and the associated myelosuppressive effects: A review. J Pharm Pract. 2014; 27(5):440-6. [DOI:10.1177/0897190014546108] [PMID]
  57. Barton DL, Thanarajasingam G, Sloan JA, Diekmann B, Fuloria J, Kottschade LA, et al. Phase III double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of gabapentin for the prevention of delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, NCCTG N08C3 (Alliance). Cancer. 2014; 120(22):3575-83. [DOI:10.1002/cncr.28892] [PMID] [PMCID]
  58. Chearwae W, Shukla S, Limtrakul P, Ambudkar SV. Modulation of the function of the multidrug resistance-linked ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 by the cancer chemopreventive agent curcumin. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006; 5(8):1995-2006. [DOI:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0087] [PMID]
  59. Harbottle A, Daly AK, Atherton K, Campbell FC. Role of glutathione S‐transferase P1, P‐glycoprotein and multidrug resistance‐associated Protein 1 in acquired doxorubicin resistance. Int J Cancer. 2001; 92(6):777-83. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.1283] [PMID]
  60. Lin MG, Liu LP, Li CY, Zhang M, Chen Y, Qin J, et al. Scutellaria extract decreases the proportion of side population cells in a myeloma cell line by down-regulating the expression of ABCG2 protein. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013; 14(12):7179-86. [DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.12.7179] [PMID]
  61. Yao CJ, Yeh CT, Lee LM, Chuang SE, Yeh CF, Chao WJ, et al. Elimination of cancer stem-like “side population” cells in hepatoma cell lines by chinese herbal mixture “tien-hsien liquid”. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012; 2012:1-10. [DOI:10.1155/2012/617085] [PMID] [PMCID]
  62. Mukherjee S, Bhattacharya RK, Roy M. Targeting Protein Kinase C (PKC) and telomerase by Phenethyl Isothiocyanate (PEITC) sensitizes PC-3 cells towards chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2009; 28(4):269-82 [DOI:10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.v28.i4.30]
  63. Zhang Y, Tang L. Discovery and development of sulforaphane as a cancer chemopreventive phytochemical. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007; 28(9):1343-54. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00679.x] [PMID]
  64. Huang XT, Li X, Xie ML, Huang Z, Huang YX, Wu GX, et al. Resveratrol: Review on its discovery, pharmacokinetics and anti-leukemia effects. Chem Biol Interact. 2019; 306:29-38 [DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2019.04.001] [PMID]
  65. Shankar S, Nall D, Tang SN, Meeker D, Passarini J, Sharma J, et al. Resveratrol inhibits pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics in human and KrasG12D transgenic mice by inhibiting pluripotency maintaining factors and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PlOS One. 2011; 6(1):e16530. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0016530] [PMID] [PMCID]
  66. Kakarala M, Brenner DE, Korkaya H, Cheng C, Tazi K, Ginestier C, et al. Targeting breast stem cells with the cancer preventive compounds curcumin and piperine. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 122(3):777-85. [DOI:10.1007/s10549-009-0612-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  67. Shahcheraghi S, Zangui M, Lotfi M, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ghorbani A, Jaliani H, et al. Therapeutic potential of curcumin in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Current pharmaceutical design. Curr Pharm Des. 2019; 25(3):333-43. [DOI:10.2174/1381612825666190313123704] [PMID]
  68. Lin L, Liu Y, Li H, Li P, Fuchs J, Shibata H, et al. Targeting colon cancer stem cells using a new curcumin analogue, GO-Y030. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105(2):212-20. [DOI:10.1038/bjc.2011.200] [PMID] [PMCID]
  69. Park S, Sung J, Chung N. Berberine diminishes side population and down-regulates stem cell-associated genes in the pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014; 394(1-2):209-15. [DOI:10.1007/s11010-014-2096-1] [PMID]
  70. Bar EE, Chaudhry A, Lin A, Fan X, Schreck K, Matsui W, et al. Cyclopamine‐mediated hedgehog pathway inhibition depletes stem‐like cancer cells in glioblastoma. Stem Cells. 2007; 25(10):2524-33. [DOI:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0166] [PMID] [PMCID]
  71. Lu LG, Zeng MD, Mao YM, Fang JY, Song YL, Shen ZH, et al. Inhibitory effect of oxymatrine on serum hepatitis B virus DNA in HBV transgenic mice. World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10(8):1176-9. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v10.i8.1176] [PMID] [PMCID]
  72. Zhang Y, Piao B, Zhang Y, Hua B, Hou W, Xu W, et al. Oxymatrine diminishes the side population and inhibits the expression of β-catenin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2011; 28(1):99-107. [DOI:10.1007/s12032-010-9721-y] [PMID]
  73. Kim MH. Flavonoids inhibit VEGF/bFGF‐induced angiogenesis in vitro by inhibiting the matrix‐degrading proteases. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 89(3):529-38. [DOI:10.1002/jcb.10543] [PMID]
  74. Zhou W, Kallifatidis G, Baumann B, Rausch V, Mattern J, Gladkich J, et al. Dietary polyphenol quercetin targets pancreatic cancer stem cells. Int J Oncol. 2010; 37(3):551-61. [DOI:10.3892/ijo_00000704] [PMID]
  75. Tsai PH, Cheng CH, Lin CY, Huang YT, Lee LT, Kandaswami CC, et al. Dietary flavonoids luteolin and quercetin suppressed cancer stem cell properties and metastatic potential of isolated prostate cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2016; 36(12):6367-80. [DOI:10.21873/anticanres.11234] [PMID]
  76. Cook MT, Liang Y, Besch-Williford C, Goyette S, Mafuvadze B, Hyder SM. Luteolin inhibits progestin-dependent angiogenesis, stem cell-like characteristics, and growth of human breast cancer xenografts. Springerplus. 2015; 4(444): 1-16. [DOI:10.1186/s40064-015-1242-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  77. Clement V, Sanchez P, De Tribolet N, Radovanovic I, i Altaba AR. HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling regulates human glioma growth, cancer stem cell self-renewal, and tumorigenicity. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(2):165-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.024] [PMID] [PMCID]
  78. Feldmann G, Dhara S, Fendrich V, Bedja D, Beaty R, Mullendore M, et al. Blockade of hedgehog signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion and metastases: A new paradigm for combination therapy in solid cancers. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(5):2187-96. [DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3281] [PMID] [PMCID]
  79. Montales MTE, Rahal OM, Kang J, Rogers T, Prior RL, Wu X, et al. Repression of mammosphere formation of human breast cancer cells by soy isoflavone genistein and blueberry polyphenolic acids suggests diet-mediated targeting of cancer stem-like/progenitor cells. Carcinog. 2012; 33(3):652-60. [DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgr317] [PMID]
  80. Gu YY, Liu LP, Qin J, Zhang M, Chen Y, Wang D, et al. Baicalein decreases side population proportion via inhibition of ABCG2 in multiple myeloma cell line RPMI 8226 in vitro. Fitoterapia. 2014; 94:21-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.fitote.2014.01.019] [PMID]
  81. Bai Y, Hayashi R, Hata T. Kinetic studies of Carboxypeptidase Y: II. Effects of substrate and product analogs on peptidase and esterase activities. J Biochem. 1975; 77(1):81-8. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130721]
  82. Huang Y, Zeng F, Xu L, Zhou J, Liu X, Le H. Anticancer effects of cinnamic acid in lung adenocarcinoma cell line h1299-derived stem-like cells. Oncol Res Featuring Preclin Clin Cancer Ther. 2012; 20(11):499-507. [DOI:10.3727/096504013X13685487925095] [PMID]
  83. Lim JY, Kim YS, Kim KM, Min SJ, Kim Y. Β-carotene inhibits neuroblastoma tumorigenesis by regulating cell differentiation and cancer cell stemness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014; 450(4):1475-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.021] [PMID]
  84. Kim SH, Choi KC. Anti-cancer effect and underlying mechanism (s) of kaempferol, a phytoestrogen, on the regulation of apoptosis in diverse cancer cell models. Toxicol Res. 2013; 29(4):229-34. [DOI:10.5487/TR.2013.29.4.229] [PMID] [PMCID]
  85. Nguyen T, Tran E, Ong C, Lee S, Do P, Huynh T, et al. Kaempferol‐induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in A549 lung cancer cells is mediated by activation of MEK‐MAPK. J Cell Physiol. 2003; 197(1):110-21. [DOI:10.1002/jcp.10340] [PMID]
  86. Luo H, Daddysman MK, Rankin GO, Jiang BH, Chen YC. Kaempferol enhances cisplatin’s effect on ovarian cancer cells through promoting apoptosis caused by down regulation of cMyc. Cancer Cell Int. 2010; 10(16):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1475-2867-10-16] [PMID] [PMCID]
  87. Liang S, Marti T, Dorn P, Froment L, Hall S, Berezowska S, et al. Blocking the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathway abrogates resistance to anti-folate chemotherapy in lung cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015; 6(7):e1824. [DOI:10.1038/cddis.2015.195] [PMID] [PMCID]
  88. Soltanian S, Riahirad H, Pabarja A, Karimzadeh MR, Saeidi K, Perez-Tejada E, et al. Kaempferol and docetaxel diminish side population and down-regulate some cancer stem cell markers in breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Biocell. 2017; 41(2-3):33-40.
  89. Piantelli M, Rossi C, Iezzi M, La Sorda R, Iacobelli S, Alberti S, et al. Flavonoids inhibit melanoma lung metastasis by impairing tumor cells endothelium interactions. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 207(1):23-9. [DOI:10.1002/jcp.20510] [PMID]
  90. Osada M, Imaoka S, Funae Y. Apigenin suppresses the expression of VEGF, an important factor for angiogenesis, in endothelial cells via degradation of HIF‐1α protein. FEBS Let. 2004; 575(1-3):59-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.08.036] [PMID]
  91. Erdogan S, Doganlar O, Doganlar ZB, Serttas R, Turkekul K, Dibirdik I, et al. The flavonoid apigenin reduces prostate cancer CD44+ stem cell survival and migration through PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling. Life Sci. 2016; 162:77-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.lfs.2016.08.019] [PMID]
  92. Vergara D, Simeone P, Bettini S, Tinelli A, Valli L, Storelli C, et al. Antitumor activity of the dietary diterpene carnosol against a panel of human cancer cell lines. Food Funct. 2014; 5(6):1261-9. [DOI:10.1039/c4fo00023d] [PMID]
  93. Giacomelli C, Daniele S, Natali L, Iofrida C, Flamini G, Braca A, et al. Carnosol controls the human glioblastoma stemness features through the epithelial-mesenchymal transition modulation and the induction of cancer stem cell apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):15174. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15360-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
  94. Yi L, Su Q. Molecular mechanisms for the anti-cancer effects of diallyl disulfide. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013; 57:362-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2013.04.001] [PMID]
  95. Huang J, Yang B, Xiang T, Peng W, Qiu Z, Wan J, et al. Diallyl disulfide inhibits growth and metastatic potential of human triple‐negative breast cancer cells through inactivation of the β‐catenin signaling pathway. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015; 59(6):1063-75. [DOI:10.1002/mnfr.201400668] [PMID]
  96. Xie X, Huang X, Tang H, Ye F, Yang L, Guo X, et al. Diallyl Disulfide inhibits breast cancer stem cell progression and glucose metabolism by targeting CD44/PKM2/AMPK signaling. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017; 18(6):592-9. [DOI:10.2174/1568009617666171024165657] [PMID]
  97. Ailles LE, Weissman IL. Cancer stem cells in solid tumors. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007; 18(5):460-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2007.10.007] [PMID]
  98. Gopalan V, Islam F, Lam AK. Surface markers for the identification of cancer stem cells. Cancer Stem Cells. 2018; 1692:17-29 [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-7401-6_2] [PMID]
  99. Nunes T, Hamdan D, Leboeuf C, El Bouchtaoui M, Gapihan G, Nguyen T, et al. Targeting cancer stem cells to overcome chemoresistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(12): 4036. [DOI:10.3390/ijms19124036] [PMID] [PMCID]
  100. Thomas ML, Coyle KM, Sultan M, Vaghar-Kashani A, Marcato P. Chemoresistance in cancer stem cells and strategies to overcome resistance. Chemother. 2014; 3(1):1-10. [DOI:10.4172/2167-7700.1000125]
Type of Study: Review article | Subject: Pharmacology

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb