1. Cooper R, Foster M. Sociotechnical systems. Am Psychol 1971; 26(5): 467-74. [
DOI]
2. Benner L. Accident investigations: Multi linear events sequencing methods. J Safety Res 1975; 7(2): 67-73.
3. Hollnagel E. An application of the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to risk assessment of organizational change. Available at: Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten.se, Updated in: 2013.
4. Hollnagel E. FRAM, the functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems. 1st ed Farnham (UK): Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2012 .22-3
5. Bjerga T, Aven T, Zio E. Uncertainty treatment in risk analysis of complex systems: the cases of STAMP and FRAM. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2016; 156: 203-9. [
DOI]
6. Frost B, Mo JP. System hazard analysis of a complex socio-technical system: the functional resonance analysis method in hazard identification In Proceeding of Australian System Safety Conference, Melbourne Australia 2014; 28-30.
7. Toroody AB, Abaei MM, Gholamnia R. Conceptual compression discussion on a multi-linear (FTA) and systematic (FRAM) method in an offshore operation's accident modeling. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2016; 22(4): 532-40. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2016. 1157399. [
PubMed]
8. Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution 2nd ed. Milwaukee (WI) ASQ Quality Press; 2003. 17-18
9. Liu H-C, Liu L, Liu N. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 2013; 40(2): 828-38. [
DOI]
10. Hollnagel E, Pruchnicki S, Woltjer R, Etcher S, editors. Analysis of comair flight 5191 with the functional resonance accident model. In 8th International Symposium of the Australian Aviation Psychology Association 2008 Apr; 8.
11. Patriarca R, Di Gravio G, Costantino F, Tronci M. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach. Environ Impact Asses 2017; 63: 72-86. [
DOI]
12. Albery S, Borys D, Tepe S. Advantages for risk assessment: Evaluating learnings from question sets inspired by the FRAM and the risk matrix in a manufacturing environment. Safety Sci 2016; 89: 180-9. [
DOI]
13. Shirali GA, Ebrahimipour V, Mohammad Salahi L. Proactive risk assessment to identify emergent risks using Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM): a case study in an oil process unit. Iran Occup Health 2013; 10(6): 33-46.
14. Amorim AG, Pereira CM. Improvisation at workplace and accident causation-an exploratory study. Procedia Manuf 2015; 3: 1804-11. [
DOI]
15. Woltjer R. Resilience assessment based on models of functional resonance. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Resilience Engineering; 2008; 9.
16. Patriarca R, Di Gravio G, Costantino F. A Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to assess performance variability in complex systems. Saf Sci 2017; 91: 49-60. [
DOI]
17. Rosa LV, Haddad AN, de Carvalho PVR. Assessing risk in sustainable construction using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM). Cognition, Technology & Work 2015; 17(4): 559-73. [
DOI]
18. Sujan MA, Felici M. Combining failure mode and functional resonance analyses in healthcare settings. Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security 2012: 364-75. [
DOI]