Volume 23, Issue 1 (Apr - May 2019)                   J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2019, 23(1): 74-83 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kheirkhah A, Gholamnia R, Kavousi A. Evaluation of the Establishment of the Emergency Management System Based on Health, Safety, and the Environment Management System and Oil and Gas Producers Standards. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2019; 23 (1) :74-83
URL: http://journal.qums.ac.ir/article-1-2684-en.html
1- Workplace Health Promotion Research Center, Shahid Beheshti university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Workplace Health Promotion Research Center, Shahid Beheshti university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Health, Safety and Environment, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , gholamnia@sbmu.ac.ir
3- Workplace Health Promotion Research Center, Shahid Beheshti university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (538 Views)
Background Emergency action plans and procedures importance in occupational health issues in Iran's industry. 
Objective Research was conducted to evaluate the emergency action plan based on HSE-MS standards.
Methods This article is a cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study that was conducted in a large food industry company in 2017. A questionnaire was designed and used based on HSE-MS and OGP standard for providing an emergency response plan. Validity index: CVR: 0.83, CVI: 0.98. Cronbach's alpha was adopted to test reliability α:0.88 for ERP questionnaire and α:0.93 for knowledge questionnaire, both reliability and validity were acceptable. Risk assessment was performed by the FMEA method, and the result was analyzed. 
Findings Questionnaire analysis showed that 73% frequency of response was yes, which can be acceptable. Also, the system failure point based on the questionnaire was determined by determining severity, frequency, and detection probability, 436 activity was evaluated. The result showed that 28 of the risk with a priority number of over 300 and 58 risks were above the risk level of 150 and 13 risks were risky at a critical level. (two risk factor higher than 6).
Conclusion Noncompliance cases were in the design and planning scenarios of emergency and relief and rescue instruction. Therefore training program and operational maneuvers for ammonia chamber room, CIP+CBH chemical storage depot and boiler had a high priority for the highest risk program indicators. 
Full-Text [PDF 4280 kb]   (166 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (62 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Occupational Health Engineering

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb